Product Benefits vs. Brand Ideas?
If you're working in the advertising industry or at least going to, "Positioning" will be one of the jobs you will spend a lot of time with. No matter if you're positioning a brand or a product - the question will always be "what should itstand for?".In the classic marketing world the answer was not that hard to find: You just underlined the USP with a red marker - done! Today USPs are rare. I'm not sure if they still exist or if they're truly recognized by the customer. Hence you need a bigger toolbox to create relevance. You can even position whole brands around a 'brand idea' or a certain tonality or brand world (often achieved by a distinctive look & feel like the California College world of Tommy Hilfiger).
For those type of strategic planners who like typologies (me included), I conducted a small collection of approaches.
![]() |
Seven angles for brand positioning (2015), often these approaches are mixed, too. |
- In Germany - the country of engineer-perspective - positioning by using product benefits seems to be still the most favored approach
- 1&1's new campaign aiming at market leader Deutsche Telekom (klick) could be the door-opener for more competative positioning, even if it's more a promotion-campaign than a real brand positioning
- Emotionalizing brand’s by demonstrating certain attitudes is demanded by many clients right now, especially regarding the rise of branded content including brand statements (toom Respect-Campaign, postings about the US same-sex marriage judgement)
No comments:
Post a Comment